| |
home » Publications
» Article
» Patten: What do you think?
Patten: What do you think?
The Patten Commission: some love it, some hate it. What
do YOU think? In this pamphlet we raise some -- but
only some -- of the issues.
First, how have people reacted?
Some Unionist perceptions:
Changing the name is an insult to over 300 officers
who lost their lives to terrorists and the hundreds
seriously injured
Under the Agreement Republicans accepted that Northern
Ireland will remain part of the UK as long as the
majority want it, so why won't they accept the flag
of the UK?
Republicans could use Local Police Boards to give
security jobs to terrorists.
The proposal to select an equal number of Protestants
and Catholics from the pool of qualified candidates
will discriminate against Protestants if there are
more qualified Protestants than Catholics
On the positive side many Unionists were happy that
the RUC was not abolished
Some Nationalist/Republican
perceptions:
It's still the RUC, even if they change the name.
RUC officers guilty of murder and collusion will
still be policemen. They should disband it.
There has been no apology for past abuses
The police force will still be British
On the positive side many Nationalists believe that
in a new political context the police may be properly
accountable
RUC perceptions
We paid a high price fighting terrorism and look
at all the thanks we get.
Taking away our symbols is an insult to us
Republicans talk a lot about collusion among the
security forces, but what about their collusion with
Republicans in murdering police officers?
What does the Report Recommend?
The Patten Commission?s goal was neither to defend
nor attack the RUC. Instead they asked: how can we
get a new beginning for policing in Northern Ireland
based on cooperation between the police and the community,
including both Unionists and Nationalists?
Human rights
There is a great stress on human rights in the document.
The Commission want a new code of ethics for officers
based on the European Convention on Human Rights and
also much more emphasis on human rights in training.
Accountability
The police need to be accountable: otherwise who will
police them? On the other hand they need to be independent:
otherwise politicians, for example, could pressurise
them to cancel summonses. You can see the tension
between these two values. To deal with this the Commission
suggest new bodies at two different levels:
(i) The New Police Board for Northern Ireland
This should have 19 members: 3 each from the UUP and
SDLP and 2 each from Sinn Fein and the DUP. The other
9 should be independents appointed by the Secretary
of State and selected to represent a wide range of
interests.
The Board would set priorities for the police, draw
up a plan with the Chief Constable to achieve these
and assess how well the police carried them out. The
Board could ask the Chief Constable for a report on
any action by the police and they could call for his
or her resignation.
(ii) District Police Partnership Boards
These would be under District Councils. They would
explain community needs to the police and vice versa.
The majority of members would be elected but there
would also be independents. Meetings would be public.
With Council agreement they could raise rates to buy
extra policing services, for example, video cameras
in high-crime areas. The local police Commander should
pay attention to the concerns of the District Boards.
It should be assumed that everything is made available
to the public unless it is in the public interest
-- not in the police interest to hold it back
(6.38).
Policing with the Community
Over and over the Commission stress that policing
will only work with the consent of the community,
and with proper respect for human rights. They see
policing with the community as the core function of
the police service.
Unless both the police and the community value and
work at their relationship no structures, no matter
how good, will lead to good policing.
Each neighbourhood should have its own police team
with police serving there for 3-5 years. These teams
should set their own priorities.
The Catholic Church should encourage people to join
the police and the GAA should allow their members
to join.
Public Order Policing
Plastic bullets should be retained, but used on the
same basis as in the rest of the UK. There should
be immediate research to find alternatives.
There should be trained marshals at all parades.
Recruitment
Recruitment should be by an independent agency. More
Catholics, Nationalists, Republicans and women should
be recruited because over 90% of the RUC are Protestant
men. Catholic and Protestant recruits should be drawn
equally from the pool of qualified candidates. Young
people convicted of minor offences should not be excluded.
All officers should be obliged to declare their interests
and the groups to which they belong.
Symbols
The name should be changed to the `Northern Ireland
Police Service'. There should be a new badge and symbols
not associated with the British or Irish states. The
Union flag should not be flown from police buildings.
The Commission want people, regardless of their Constitutional
position, to see the police service as their own.
Police memorials should be retained in buildings.
If you want a more detailed summary of the Report
let us know.
Questions
- What do you like or not like about the Patten Report?
- What do people in other traditions like or not like?
- Have you different proposals with which both Nationalists
and Unionists could live?
- Will the Patten Report help policing in working-class
areas?
- What personal sacrifices would you be willing to
make for a police service which attracted widespread
support?
Your response
The Patten Commission is not law. The Government
have asked for public responses to it within three
months. If you make no response you will have
no grounds for complaining about the Government?s
final decision. Community Dialogue invites you
to meet in single identity or cross-community
groups to debate the issues. Send us your answers
and we will pass them on to the Government.
WHAT IS COMMUNITY DIALOGUE?
Community Dialogue is made up of community workers
from across the divide. As a group we take no
positions on political issues. Our aim is to build
trust and understanding through dialogue, research,
analysis and problem-solving at every level of
society. Informed dialogue can and will lead to
a settlement in Northern Ireland that is inclusive,
negotiated and equitable.
Remember: it is up to us
to make the future!
|