| |
home
» Publications
» The Way We Are
The
Way We Are
11 August 1999
The
Current Situation
If the
September review does not lead to movement we will either have to
find a new way forward or else live without agreement on the
parts of
the Agreement which have not been implemented.
Defeating
the other side is not an option
In this
document we list the feelings of Unionists and Nationalists. We then
ask what will happen if there is, and if there is not, agreement in
the September review. Finally, we ask how YOU want to move forward.
1. Feelings
A.
Nationalists
Nationalists
are angry. Here are some of their perceptions and feelings:
- `Unionists
haven’t moved an inch. We’re back to where we were
30 years ago. Decommissioning is only a blind to avoid sharing power
with us'.
- `Sinn Fein
changed their Constitution so they could move into a Stormont Assembly.
This involved a fundamental change in Republican beliefs and was only
achieved with great difficulty. Unionists do not seem to realise this'.
- `Unionists want
the IRA to surrender, not decommission, and there is no way that is
going to happen'.
- `In the Agreement
decommissioning is not a requirement for entry into the Executive. If
the Unionists were not going to keep the Agreement, why did they sign
it?'
- `The Agreement is
quite clear that decommissioning is to be handled by General de
Chastelain. John Taylor emphasised that until recently, so why not
now?'
- `Gerry Adams went
the extra mile and said he was confident the IRA would decommission by
May 2000. That statement cost a lot. Yet Unionists threw it back in his
face.'
- `Unionists want
to criminalise the whole Republican struggle. They see us as the bad
guys. Never once have they accepted responsibility for the corruption
of the old Stormont regime which caused all the trouble.'
- `It’s
nonsense to talk of IRA decommissioning with on-going Loyalist attacks.
15 August 1999 was the 30th anniversary of the Bombay Street attacks.
Republican areas need to be defended.'
B. Unionists
Unionists are
equally angry. Here are some of their perceptions and feelings.
- `All we asked is that Sinn Fein make a credible
start on decommissioning and they refused. In the recent talks Adams
could not get the IRA even to make a statement supporting him.'
- `Sinn Fein say we
are trying to keep them out of the Executive. That is not true. We will
sit down with them tomorrow -- if they start decommissioning.'
- `Republicans
murdered over 2000 people and wrecked nearly all the towns in Northern
Ireland. How can they now be part of the Government without handing in
their guns? No state in the world would tolerate that.'
- `Republicans
agreed to use exclusively peaceful means when they signed the
Agreement. They have to choose between the armalite and the ballot box.'
- `We are not
looking for an IRA surrender. All we want is convincing evidence that
the violence is over.'
- `Sinn Fein never
expressed remorse for all the murder, destruction and mayhem they
carried out against the people of Northern Ireland.'
- `Unionists have
given concession after concession in this process: North-South
structures, early release of terrorists, the Patten Commission, the
Equality Commission, and re-routing Orange parades. No more.'
- `Tony Blair gave
Unionists a written commitment that Sinn Fein would not be in the
Executive in advance of decommissioning. Why is this promise not
implemented?'
2. What
happens if there is no agreement in September?
Here are some
of the possibilities:
- The Executive, the Assembly and North-South
structures will fall. Direct rule will continue. Civil servants will
play a major role. The advice of local politicians may or may not be
taken. The people of Northern Ireland will still have only 18 out of
640 seats in the Westminster Parliament.
- Early release of
prisoners, and the Patten, Equality and Human Rights Commissions are
likely to continue.
- The British and
Irish Governments are likely to work much more closely together -- an
Anglo-Irish Agreement Mark II. Northern Ireland politicians will have
no power to prevent this.
- The political
vacuum is likely to lead to increased violence.
- With reduced
economic growth there will be less jobs, lower incomes, and less money
for community groups.
- Despite agreement
on many issues, for example, North-South structures, the appointment of
the First and Deputy First Ministers, and the powers of the Northern
Departments, we will fail to agree on the last hurdle.
3. If
there is agreement in September:
- The Executive, the Assembly and the North-South
structures will be set up. Politicians directly elected by the people
of Northern Ireland will run the 10 new Departments.
- There will be
more chance to influence policy on agriculture, education, and social
issues because the new ministers will be from Northern Ireland and will
live here.
- The people of
Northern Ireland will see their politicians working together and be
encouraged to do the same. The Civic Forum will cement ownership of,
and make a public contribution to, the new governmental institutions.
- Given the
power-sharing nature of the Executive, individual parties are likely to
hold particular ministries for the foreseeable future.
4. Questions
for Nationalists
- Would you see decommissioning as surrender if it
was part of a wider process including:
- Loyalist
decommissioning,
- progressive
disarmament of the police as the threat of paramilitaries decreases,
- new legislation
addressing the wider issue of who should have the right to bear arms?
- In the long run
which would give greater protection to Nationalists: a new agreement or
holding on to IRA arms?
- Should weapons be
in the hands of groups with no accountability to a government?
- Have Nationalists
or Republicans said sorry for hurts they imposed on Unionists over the
past 30 years? If not is it reasonable to ask Unionists to apologise
for state wrongs committed before then?
- Which is better
for Northern Nationalists: Direct Rule with greater Dublin input, or
power-sharing?
5. Questions
for Unionists
- Which will cost you more: an Executive without
prior decommissioning or the collapse of the Assembly?
- David Trimble has
said the issue is not decommissioning but knowing that the violence is
over. Are there other ways than decommissioning to show this?
- Many Republicans
have a problem with decommissioning because they see it either as
surrender or as leaving their areas defenceless. Would you surrender?
- As a matter of
principle many believe parties linked to private armies should not be
in government. Are there other political areas in which we cannot
implement our principles? For example, are we happy that our taxes are
used to spread nuclear weapons?
6. Community
Dialogue invite you to ask:
- When did you last have a serious conversation about
political issues with a person from the other tradition?
- If the Review
fails, how long will it be before over 70% of the people of Northern
Ireland accept a new Agreement and what will be its terms?
Note:
The following
quotations from the Agreement are included for reference:
a) “All
participants accordingly reaffirm their commitment to the total
disarmament of all paramilitary organisations. They also confirm
their intention to continue to work constructively and in good faith
with the Independent Commission, and to use any influence they may
have, to achieve the decommissioning of all paramilitary arms within
two years following endorsement in referendums North and South of the
agreement and in the context of the implementation of the overall
settlement” (‘Decommissioning’, para 3).
b) “We
reaffirm our total and absolute commitment to exclusively democratic
and peaceful means of resolving differences on political issues, and
our opposition to any use or threat of force by others for any
political purpose, whether in regard to this agreement or
otherwise”
(‘Declaration of Support’, para 4).
WHAT IS
COMMUNITY DIALOGUE?
Community
Dialogue is made up of community workers from across the divide. As a
group we do not take positions on political issues. However, if we
want to make peace in Northern Ireland we have to talk. Not just any
old talk: rather talk that involves questioning ourselves, listening
to others, and trying genuinely to see new angles on things.
We
invite you to make your voice heard. Why not discuss the questions in
this leaflet with your friends or work colleagues? You could also
invite people from backgrounds different from your own to join you in
discussion. If you wish, you can send your answers, ideas and other
suggestions to us at Community Dialogue and we will send them on to
the relevant authorities, or politicians.
Remember:
it is up to us to make the future!
Community
Dialogue Executive: David
Holloway (Chair), Anne
Carr, Noreen Christian, Roy Garland,Bronagh
Hinds, Bernie Laverty, John Loughran,P.
J. McClean, Billy Mitchell, Roisin McDonough,Mary
Lavery, Michaela McCabe, Andrew Park.
Coordinators: Ernie
Carroll (Finance), Brian
Lennon (Dialogue).
373
Springfield Road, Belfast BT12 7DG
Tel
028-90-329995 Fax 028-90-330482 Mob 0410-741963
E-mail:
admin@commdial.org Web: www.commdial.org
11
August 1999
|